Login - Register - Sitemap - About us - advertise - guest book - contact us -  

To Advertise

 Click Here

 


Home >> ABOUT INFA >> Archives

Web

sarkaritel.com


 

PRINT   FEEDBACK

 

 

 

Economic Highlights

 

US, China Policies

INDIA MUST GUARD AGAINST ONSLAUGHT

By Shivaji Sarkar

 

New Delhi, April 15, 2010

 

India needs to be cautious in its dealings with the US on the one side and China on the other. More so when it is time for the country to provide a global model. However, it has little to cheer from the visits of US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner or External Affairs Minister SM Krishna’s visit to China.

Washington is eyeing for a $ 600 billion investment in India’s infrastructure, as the returns are very high. Closer ties with China saddles India with a massive trade deficit of $ 15.8 billion. It is no better for the US, which has a trade deficit of $ 227 billion as it imports $ 296 billion worth of items from China and exports only $ 69 billion products. This happens as Beijing keeps its currency, the Yuan artificially low.

As New Delhi accepts large investments from the US in infrastructure, it suffers on two counts – cost of infrastructure development goes up and the country’s manufacturing sector continues to remain weak. However, Beijing has cleverly taken this advantage from the US. The major merchandise export to the US from China is from the manufacturing sector that produces at extremely, often artificial, low costs. It is hitting the US economy hard and if India does not learn the lessons from the US, then it would hit its economy harder.

The US has primarily suffered because it ignored the growth of the Chinese manufacturing sector, which was being fuelled by US imports. China simultaneously took the economic and financial initiative to create a safety net for itself so that the US could not suddenly withdraw from its market. It invested heavily to create a dollar reserve. In November 2009, China owned $789 billion in the US Treasuries, 33 per cent of the total $2.4 trillion outstanding. This makes it the largest owner. Many are concerned that it gives China political leverage over US’ fiscal policy.

The high trade volume China has with the US also provides it the base for low-priced manufactured product exports to India, which has not learnt from the woes of the US. America’s trade deficit with China means that the US companies that can't compete with cheap Chinese goods must either lower their costs or go out of business.

It has already happened to many sectors in India, including electrical, electronics and toys. Many Indian companies either have gone out of business or have become houses that trade in Chinese goods. Either way it leads to losing of jobs and the edge that manufacturing sector gives to a country.

The US has learnt it the hard way. India is not in that kind of a tight spot but still it has not taken any step to avoid getting into the Chinese quagmire. It is indeed surprising that New Delhi should woo China for closer trade ties. Nobody knows why India supplies iron ore to China at ridiculous export duty of one per cent. It is virtually subsidizing the Chinese manufacturing sector, which is wrecking havoc with the Indian economy. India has no obligation to supply iron ore to China, which it uses also for building arms and other strategic weapons, which are deployed on India’s borders and facilitates movement to the Tibetan plateau.

India has permission for exporting only three of the agreed list of 17 fruits and vegetables. Such exports hardly add any value but Commerce Minister Anand Sharma has apparently cowed down and almost begged China to increase that basket recently. However, Beijing has refused entry to aviation and entertainment sectors as well from where returns could be high.

A low cost Yuan is detrimental to the Indian economy. Worse, India has not sought any revision of the value of the Yuan against the Rupee. It has neither taken any trade or diplomatic initiative to contain China. And, larger trade with China may further stymie growth of the Indian manufacturing sector.

Additionally, the way it is gleeful over the US’ moves to invest in India is yet another danger. The policy makers in New Delhi overlook the recent announcements of US President Barack Obama of encouraging three emerging economies – India, China and Brazil – to buy more goods from the US to double exports in five years. US Commerce Under-Secretary for International Trade, Francisco Sanchez said this week: “That's where the money is and that's where we need to focus”, noting that 95 per cent of the world's consumers live outside the US.

The US with high unemployment rate of 10 per cent needs that strategy. There has been minor increase in jobs in the private sector as the US has decided to push its $1.4 trillion budget deficit. It is also pushing its economy with virtual zero interest rates. High deficits not only in the US but also by all major European countries threaten an uneven global competition. It would force India to hedge against artificial values of most global currencies and price its goods uneconomically.

India has not protested at the high budget deficit trends of these countries. It has pushed up crude prices to $ 85 a barrel from $ 65 to 69 a week ago as such deficits create false hope of a US recovery, which is just not happening. It certainly helps the oil companies, most of which are based in the US, rake in huge profits. In other words, India and other countries would be subsidizing US budget deficits.

The US has recently stated that it is borrowing less form the rest of the world. In fact, it has honed up its strategy in such a way that it does not need to borrow and the rest of the world would subsidise its economy as it adopts devious techniques. Importantly, India needs to be aware of this and must sharpen its policies to guard against such subtle onslaughts. More so when despite a thaw in the downtrend, job prospects in India have not brightened up. That is the key to a recovery.

If India falls prey to the policies of the US and China, the prospect of its own recovery and consequent growth might get muted. The policy makers need to stand up firmly and chalk out an aggressive strategy to shield the country against such evil maneuvers. The country does not need to succumb to the temptation of increasing low-cost exports just to shore up statistical presentations. – INFA
 

(Copyright India News & Feature Alliance)

 

E-Mail : newseditor@sarkaritel.com

 

HOME ABOUT US FORUM ADVERTISE
 

 

Copyright © 2008 Sarkaritel.com. All Rights Reserved.
The Site is best viewed in 1024 x 768 pixels